MX608WN New Balance MX608 Men’s Crosstrainer

5 Comments

1. P. Freeman says:

   December 31, 2009 at 8:13 am

   The 608 squeak in size 12 EE. I forgot that I tried a pair a year ago from a local sporting goods and returned them. The 620s or the old 606s don’t squeak. People at my work joke that I can’t sneak up on anybody
   Rating: 1 / 6
2. Robert H. Walters says:

   December 31, 2009 at 9:45 am

   I received my shoes in a timely manner and at a very respectful price. thank you!
   Rating: 5 / 6
3. Jeffrey A. Walter says:

   December 31, 2009 at 10:53 am

   Excellent Transaction. I highly recommend this seller. Super fast shipping and product is as described.
   Rating: 5 / 6
4. Donald Leighty says:

   December 31, 2009 at 12:11 pm

   I’ve worn New Balance shoes for walking since the late ’80s or early ’90s. They lasted years. Last fall I bought a new pair that started to fall apart within a few months (since I haven’t been taking daily walks for almost a year now, this was brought about merely by walking the dog and pushing a lawnmower around the yard). Another pair did the same thing, so I started hassling NB a couple of weeks ago. Told them the shoes looked like they had a bad sunburn, with a thin, rubbery white coating peeling and shedding from the synthetic foam underneath. It’s completely gone from the toe and much of the sides. Where’s the leather???

   After getting several conflicting stories from the girls who answer the phones (and sending one pair of MX608s back to their laboratory for an ‘examination’), I finally received the following explanation from someone higher up:

   “Thank you for contacting New Balance Consumer Support!

   The tip, vamp, entire heel area and the quarters of the MX608 are all leather. It is called split leather because it is “split away” from the top layer, which is called full grain. The 2-3 layers you can split away from that are called split leathers. The surface of the split is treated with a pu coating and painted. Splits are real leather.

   The mudguard area of the shoe is a synthetic material. This is the area along the sides directly above the midsole. If this area of the shoe is abrading, then what you are seeing could be the backing of the synthetic material which is made of compressed fibers.

   Additionally, very few athletic shoes are made of top grain or full grain leather anymore. It is just too expensive. All of the 608s are made this way, so there should not be a difference among different pairs.”

   This gave me enough information to start digging into the realities of “split leather” (or “bicast leather” as it is more commonly known). This is from Wikipedia:

   “Bicast leather (also known as bycast leather, split leather or PU leather) is a split leather with a layer of polyurethane applied to the surface and then embossed. Bycast was originally made for the shoe industry and recently was adopted by the furniture industry. The resulting product is cheaper than top grain leather and has an artificially consistent texture and is easier to clean and maintain.

   The use of the term ‘leather’ in relation to this bicast treatment is considered a misrepresentation and therefore not permitted in the United Kingdom and New Zealand. Furniture made with bicast exhibits none of the characteristics associated with genuine leather; it will not develop a patina or suppleness nor otherwise “improve with age”. With constant use the polyurethane layer will crack and split free of its backing.

   Modern technology permits up to 3 or 4 horizontal layers being taken from the one hide. The leather used in the backing of bicast is a thin, otherwise worthless, layer remaining after better quality layers have been removed for traditional leather work and contributes nothing to the look and feel of the end product.”

   Nice.

   That’s Wikipedia’s take, but the conclusions match those of professional leatherworkers as well. New Balance has changed from a durable real leather upper to a bicast “leather”, the use of which several countries have already ruled is deliberately misleading.
   Rating: 1 / 6
5. Roger E. Osmun says:

   December 31, 2009 at 12:49 pm

   Just a short note to state that everything went with out a hitch.
   
   Delivery was on time and product was just what we expected to get.

   Rating: 5 / 6